Continuity is one equation, and it is the equation that makes substitution legal. Everything else in this chapter follows from it.
By the end of this chapter you can
State the three conditions for continuity at a point
Classify a discontinuity as removable, jump, or infinite
Choose a constant that makes a piecewise function continuous
Apply the Intermediate Value Theorem, and say what it does not promise
Chapter 1.1 insisted that limx→af(x) and f(a) are different
questions. Continuity is the name for the situation where they happen to have
the same answer — and that is the situation in which the whole of move 1,
substitution, is legal.
f is continuous at a when
x→alimf(x)=f(a)
which is really three demands folded into one line, and it is worth unfolding
them because an exam question usually breaks exactly one:
f(a)exists — a is in the domain.
limx→af(x)exists — both one-sided limits agree.
They are equal.
The three ways it breaks
Each failure has a name, and naming it is often the question.
Removable. The limit exists but the value does not match it — either f(a)
is undefined, or it is defined to be something else. The graph has a hole.
f(x)=x−1x2−1at x=1
The limit is 2; f(1) does not exist. Defining f(1)=2 repairs it
completely, which is why it is called removable.
x→1lim(x−1x2−1)=2
checked by the build
Jump. The one-sided limits both exist and disagree, so condition 2 fails.
No redefinition at the single point can help — the problem is on both sides of
it, not at it.
Infinite. The function grows without bound, so condition 2 fails in a
different way. x21 at 0, or tanx at 2π.
x→0limx21=∞
checked by the build
Making a function continuous on purpose
The standard exam question: a piecewise function with an unknown constant, and
“find k so that f is continuous”. The method follows straight from the three
conditions — set the one-sided limits equal to each other and to the value.
For
f(x)={x2+k3x−1x≤2x>2
the left limit is 4+k, the right limit is 5, and continuity demands they
match: k=1.
5=5
checked by the build
That verified line is the condition, written out at the joint. If the two
sides do not agree there, no choice of k makes them.
The Intermediate Value Theorem
If f is continuous on the closed interval [a,b], and N is any value
between f(a) and f(b), then f(c)=N for at least one c in (a,b).
Informally: a continuous function cannot get from one value to another without
passing through everything in between. It is obvious once stated and it is the
tool behind every “show that this equation has a solution” question.
To show x3+x−1=0 has a root between 0 and 1: the function is a
polynomial, so continuous; at 0 it is −1; at 1 it is 1. Zero lies
between them, so some c in (0,1) gives exactly zero.
−1=−1
1=1
checked by the build
Those two evaluations are the entire proof. The theorem does the rest.
{
"question": "f is continuous on [1, 4] with f(1) = −3 and f(4) = 5. Which conclusion does the Intermediate Value Theorem support?",
"options": [
{
"text": "There is at least one c in (1,4) with f(c) = 0",
"correct": true,
"why": "0 lies between −3 and 5, and f is continuous on the closed interval, so the theorem applies exactly. Note it gives at least one — there could be three."
},
{
"text": "There is exactly one c in (1,4) with f(c) = 0",
"correct": false,
"why": "Nothing here rules out several crossings. A function can wander up and down many times between those endpoints. Uniqueness needs a further argument, usually that f is strictly increasing."
},
{
"text": "f is increasing on (1,4)",
"correct": false,
"why": "The endpoints rise but the path between them is unconstrained — f could dip to −100 first. Continuity says nothing about direction."
},
{
"text": "f(c) = 7 for some c in (1,4)",
"correct": false,
"why": "7 is outside the interval [−3, 5], and the theorem only fills in values between the two endpoint values. f may well reach 7 somewhere, but the IVT does not promise it."
}
]
}