Four techniques, and a rule for choosing between them: substitute, factor, rationalise, or recognise a known limit.
By the end of this chapter you can
Evaluate a limit by direct substitution and say when that is legal
Resolve a 0/0 form by factoring or by rationalising
Recognise the standard limits that no algebra will produce
Choose the right technique from the shape of the expression
Chapter 1.1 said what a limit is. This one is about getting the number.
There are only four moves, and the shape of the expression tells you which to
reach for. Start by substituting — not because it always works, but because what
it produces tells you what to do next.
Move 1: substitute
If f is built from polynomials, roots, exponentials, sines and cosines by the
usual arithmetic, and the substitution produces an ordinary number, then that
number is the limit.
x→3lim(x2−4x+1)=9−12+1=−2
x→3lim(x2−4x+1)=−2
x→0limcos(x)=1
x→2limx+7=3
checked by the build
This is not laziness; it is a theorem. Those functions are continuous on
their domains, and continuity is precisely the statement that the limit equals
the value. Chapter 1.3 makes that formal.
Substitution can produce three kinds of result, and each is an instruction:
What you get
What it means
An ordinary number
That is the answer. Stop.
0nonzero
The limit does not exist; check the signs for ±∞
00
Indeterminate. Do more work — moves 2, 3 or 4
Move 2: factor and cancel
When substitution gives 00 in a rational function, the numerator and
denominator share a factor of (x−a). Find it, cancel it, substitute again.
The cancellation is legal for the reason chapter 1.1 gave: the two expressions
agree everywhere except at x=a, and the limit never looks at x=a.
Why the shared factor must be there. If substituting a makes the numerator
zero, then a is a root of it, and a polynomial with root a has (x−a) as a
factor. Same for the denominator. So the 00 form guarantees the
cancellation exists — you are never searching blindly.
Move 3: rationalise
A root in the expression blocks factoring. Multiply by the conjugate instead,
which converts a difference of roots into a difference of squares.
The middle step is the whole trick: (1+x−1)(1+x+1)=(1+x)−1=x,
and that x cancels the one downstairs. The conjugate does for roots exactly
what factoring does for polynomials — it produces the shared factor that the
00 form promised.
Move 4: recognise
Some limits yield to no algebra at all. These are worth memorising, because the
exam expects them and no manipulation produces them:
x→0limxsinx=1x→0limx1−cosx=0x→0limxex−1=1
x→0lim(xsin(x))=1
x→0lim(x1−cos(x))=0
x→0lim(xex−1)=1
x→0lim(x21−cos(x))=21
x→0lim(xtan(x))=1
checked by the build
Note the fourth: x1−cosx→0 but x21−cosx→21.
The numerator vanishes like x2, not like x — so which denominator you divide
by changes the answer entirely. Students who memorise only the first of those get
the second wrong every time.
These three are the derivatives of sin, cos and ex at zero, which is why
they turn up everywhere in chapter 2.
Composing them
Most real limits need two moves. xsin5x is not a standard limit,
but it becomes one after a rearrangement:
xsin5x=5⋅5xsin5x
and as x→0 the inner argument 5x→0 too, so the fraction tends to 1
and the whole thing to 5.
x→0lim(xsin(5x))=5
x→0lim(sin(7x)sin(3x))=73
x→0lim(xe2x−1)=2
checked by the build
The pattern: make the argument and the denominator match, then the standard
limit applies and the constant comes out front.
{
"question": "Substituting into lim(x→2) (x² − x − 2)/(x² − 4) gives 0/0. What does that tell you?",
"options": [
{
"text": "That both numerator and denominator have a factor of (x − 2), so cancelling will resolve it",
"correct": true,
"why": "Right, and it is a guarantee rather than a hope: substituting 2 makes each polynomial zero, so 2 is a root of each, so (x − 2) divides each. Cancelling gives (x+1)/(x+2) → 3/4."
},
{
"text": "That the limit is 0, since the numerator approaches 0",
"correct": false,
"why": "The denominator approaches 0 too, and that competition is exactly what makes the form indeterminate. Here the answer is 3/4 — neither 0 nor 1 nor undefined."
},
{
"text": "That the limit does not exist",
"correct": false,
"why": "0/0 says the algebra has no opinion yet, not that there is no answer. Non-existence looks like disagreeing one-sided limits or unbounded growth, neither of which this has."
},
{
"text": "That you must rationalise, because factoring only works when there are no squares",
"correct": false,
"why": "Rationalising is for expressions containing roots. This is a ratio of polynomials, so factoring is the tool; squares are no obstacle to it."
}
]
}